Acceptability, feasibility, and likelihood of stakeholders implementing the novel BPaL regimen to treat extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis patients.

BACKGROUND: BPaL, a 6 month oral regimen composed of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid for treating extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) is a potential alternative for at least 20 months of individualized treatment regimens (ITR). The ITR has low tolerability, treatment adherence, and success rates, and hence to limit patient burden, loss to follow-up and the emergence of resistance it is essential to implement new DR-TB regimens. The objective of this study was to assess the acceptability, feasibility, and likelihood of implementing BPaL in Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, and Nigeria. METHODS: We conducted a concurrent mixed-methods study among a cross-section of health care workers, programmatic and laboratory stakeholders between May 2018 and May 2019. We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions to assess perceptions on acceptability and feasibility of implementing BPaL. We determined the proportions of a recoded 3-point Likert scale (acceptable; neutral; unacceptable), as well as the overall likelihood of implementing BPaL (likely; neutral; unlikely) that participants graded per regimen, pre-defined aspect and country. We analysed the qualitative results using a deductive framework analysis. RESULTS: In total 188 stakeholders participated in this study: 63 from Kyrgyzstan, 51 from Indonesia, and 74 from Nigeria The majority were health care workers (110). Overall, 88% (146/166) of the stakeholders would likely implement BPaL once available. Overall acceptability for BPaL was high, especially patient friendliness was often rated as acceptable (93%, 124/133). In contrast, patient friendliness of the ITR was rated as acceptable by 45%. Stakeholders appreciated that BPaL would reduce workload and financial burden on the health care system. However, several stakeholders expressed concerns regarding BPaL safety (monitoring), long-term efficacy, and national regulatory requirements regarding introduction of the regimen. Stakeholders stressed the importance of addressing current health systems constraints as well, especially in treatment and safety monitoring systems. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptability and feasibility of the BPaL regimen is high among TB stakeholders in Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, and Nigeria. The majority is willing to start using BPaL as the standard of care for eligible patients despite country-specific health system constraints.

Introducing bedaquiline: experiences from the Challenge TB Project.

BACKGROUND: Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) remains a global public health crisis. In 2013, the World Health Organization recommended the introduction of bedaquiline (BDQ) for eligible DR-TB patients.METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review and analyses of project reports from 2016 to mid-2019 on the processes, activities implemented, available results on enrolment and interim treatment outcomes, across the 23 Challenge TB (CTB) supported countries.RESULTS: Initial introduction of BDQ-containing regimens in the 23 CTB-supported countries took on average 2 years, with subsequent nation-wide scale-up achieved in Ethiopia and Kyrgyzstan within a short time period. Successful implementation required critical interventions including advocacy, revision of policies and guidelines, capacity building of health care workers, and strengthening of laboratory networks. The number of countries providing BDQ increased from 9 to 23; 9398 patients were enrolled on bedaquiline containing regimens; 71% were culture-negative after 6 months of treatment; and the number of countries reporting serious adverse events increased (from 5 to 18). Major challenges included limited in-country coordination with drug regulatory agencies, unrealistic quantification and drug ordering, weak laboratory networks and reporting systems for drug safety.CONCLUSION: BDQ introduction required a systematic and programmatic approach. The initial time investment helped achieve initial introduction and scale-up of coverage, ownership and sustainability by National TB Programmes.

QTc and anti-tuberculosis drugs: a perfect storm or a tempest in a teacup? Review of evidence and a risk assessment.

Treatment outcome of multidrug/extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in Latvia, 2000-2004.

In the present study, we characterised drug-resistance patterns, compared treatment outcome between extensively and nonextensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (non-XDR-TB) cases, and assessed risk factors for poor outcome in a high-prevalence country that screens all TB patients for first-line anti-TB drug resistance. We reviewed drug susceptibility test results among all pulmonary TB cases in Latvia diagnosed from 2000-2004, as well as demographic and clinical characteristics, drug-resistance patterns, and treatment outcomes. During the 5-yr period, 1,027 multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) cases initiated treatment. Among all cases, the proportion that experienced an outcome of cure or completion increased from 66.2 to 70.2% (p = 0.06 for linear trend). Among the 48 (4.7%) XDR-TB cases, 18 (38%) were cured, four (8%) died, three (6%) defaulted, and treatment failed in 23 (48%). In proportional-hazards analysis, characteristics significantly associated with poor outcome included XDR-TB, being retired, presence of bilateral cavitation, and previous MDR-TB treatment history for those aged ≥55 yrs. Overall, treatment success among all MDR-TB cases increased over time. Strategies to prevent transmission of XDR-TB and to further improve treatment outcome are crucial for the future of TB control in Latvia.

Adjunctive resectional lung surgery for extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis (TB) poses significant management challenges as there are limited pharmacological treatment options for cure. Adjunctive resectional lung surgery decreases case-fatality rates for some patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), but its use has not been well documented for patients with XDR-TB. We describe 17 XDR-TB patients treated with surgery as part of their case management in Latvia during 1999-2005. One patient had no previous TB treatment history, 10 were previously treated for drug-susceptible TB and six were previously treated for MDR-TB. Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from the 17 patients were resistant to a mean of 9.2 drugs. Due to failure of pharmacological therapy, one due to a large cavity and one due to pulmonary haemorrhage, 15 patients were treated with surgery. Despite failure of pharmacological treatment in 15 out of 17 patients, eight (47%) were cured with adjunctive surgical treatment. Surgery should be explored as a possible treatment option for patients with XDR-TB.